Forward Commander

Is there right to have departments for this? The aunt goes for two years like that

One more example of that the Spanish socialist party is not of lefts and it governs neither against the capital nor nothing of that. It seems incredible that a minister who should try to fight for the access to a housing, says this. It seems that there has not understood that thing about the real estate crisis, the mortgages garbage, the bubble. Equal it has a few terrenitos that there is not can have sold or a promotion that he has had left flooded, because if not, I do not understand it.
Broker affirms that the price of the housing has started to repuntar in the urban centers

The minister of Housing, Beatriz Corredor, affirmed today that it departs from the housings 'stock' "it will not lower any more of price" and that even this one "has begun rising" in some quarters or districts of urban centers, while in the segment of the second residence and coast "they might keep on throwing the casualty".

This way it indicated it to the mass media after inaugurating II Lounge of Outlet Residencial that will celebrate in the Ifema of Madrid, from February 19 until February 21, act in which he told that both the indicators and the climate that is breathed in the sector allow to see that the end of the trip might be happening to the casualty of the prices in the urban centers and that it is necessary to wait for upturns.

Also, the Housing minister told that the buy conditions are now "significantly improve" that one year ago and a half and that is reached "a breakeven" on the residential market that allows to the buyers a major negotiation capacity. "The market be stopped neither nor arrested", it added notes.

In this sense, Broker cheered the families to buy up a housing if they need it. "East is a good year to buy the housings that the families consider to be adapted in price and that fit to his needs", pointed out Broker.

Specifically, to title it of Housing indicated that at present there happen a series of incentives that make the access to a housing easier, principalemente the fact that to buy a housing further on "will be tributariamente costlier", for the elimination of the deduction for housing buy from 2011.

Also, Broker warned that price of the housing "might bounce to the rise, especially, in the areas where of the 'stock' it is minor and begins to diminish". Also, it put in value the low interest rates and the help to the access to the housing included in the State Plan of Housing and Rehabilitation 2009-2012.

THE PROMOTERS COLLABORATE WITH THE SPA.

On the other hand, to title it of Housing was useful to emphasize the work of the Public Society of Rent in the help to the families that want to gain access to a housing, and advanced that 214 promoters have offered already 28.000 housings if to sell so that the organism manages them.

Also, Broker referred to the modification of the Technical Code of Building (CTE) approved today in the Cabinet to regulate at state level the basic conditions of accessibility and of use of the buildings that will make that all of them are "more insurances".

"With her we break barriers because we are going to finish the inequality that there endures a person who cannot raise the stairs of his house in his wheelchair or that of a blind person who cannot know to what plant it goes in an elevator, or that of a person who cannot hear or see that it is crossing the ramp of exit of a parking", he told.

Finally, Broker asked the president of the Community of Madrid to tell in what there has spent the money corresponding to the helps foreseen for the rehabilitation included in the national Plan and that they have not come to the persons from Madrid. "And if he does not know where the families of Madrid are with income lower than 41.000 euros, we can present them to him", it concluded.

The Red week for Who great it includes

From Copse in For a three-quarter bed, the red week returns to Chamberí, from which it should never have gone out, since everybody knows that it is the neuralgic center of the world left.

For sample a button: Fausto Fernández asked Ignacio González (the vice-president of the Community of Madrid that according to the Pomegranate trees spies is walked by Colombia with bags of unknown content) for the golf course of Chamberí, with which he benefited the associates of his brother and of his brother-in-law and which the justice declared illegal. “That you do not say it to me in the street”, answered the leader of the party of the hijoputas and the university ornamental combs. It went out Lucky to the street, took a computer, and one said it in the street.

On February 16, 1936 the Popular Front won in the last democratic elections in many years: the right said to the citizenship that that one was not saying it in the street. In Steel Blochevique we have read a memory of that victory of the left and, therefore, of the democracy. While, Rafa was telling us from Kabila a few intense days on historical memory.

The political week has turned on new fashionable mantra: an agreement of the State that allows us to resign from a few acquired rights and from anyone that we try to conquer. Inés was placing the debate opposite to the hollow words. In the Congress of the Deputies it was discussed, supposedly, on the crisis. In the means it was not possible to find the speech of Gaspar Llamazares, delegated of the third political force: it was necessary to look for it in the Àngels blog. Sometimes the deputies gain themselves the salary, for many demagogy that exists on this matter: viul he was reflecting on the remunerations and privileges of our politicians.

Without need for agreements, almost all the parties agree in any things: while in Holland the governments break to go out of Afghanistan, in Spain the Commission of Defense authorized the mailing of more troops to the war with the affirmative vote of the Spanish socialist party, PP, CiU, PNV and UPyD while IU was supporting the flag of Not to the war. Ceronegativo was telling it to us wondering for the famous tweezer. While, in Diseccionando The Country we saw the manipulations that exist on this occupation war: we can see in photos marines American defending a father and his daughter of the bad talibans … The bad thing is that the same father and the same girl are defended by different marines and in different time exposures in different editions of the newspapers what will do that some evil-minded one suspects that the photo is only a theater to convince us in the kindness of the war.

For tweezer the one that it is necessary to put in the nose on having seen how the town hall in which more I vote for the Spanish socialist party is of Spain, parla (Madrid), gives itself public soil for compound school. In Flies in the Soup it is indicated by wise move that what it should to us differentiate to the left is the defense of the public thing.

In the RASD a united cycle career was celebrated with the Saharan people of the one that should account to herself in Gotes d'aigua. In Basque Country it was Mikel Arana who was reflecting on the possibility of obtaining the peace immediately after the recent declaration of the Left Basque nationalist. And Luis Ángel Aguilar was telling us the curious initiative of the Pazyasos. And while so many people do things for obtaining a more just and pacific world, others are still pawned to the censoring, the threat and the Inquisition: in The Victorian Espeto there was denounced the victory of the Christian fundamentalism that has managed to close an exhibition because the new torquemadas did not like that other persons could see it freely.

Finally, I want to indicate a text that I liked very much: we are a country in which there is very few political militancy and in which the scarce democratic culture stigmatizes the political militancy. That's why it makes illusion see how the utility of the militancy is recognized when we make use of it to give voice to groups who would not have voice without IU. Manolo Lay counts his case, which is representative of some of the gratifications that the militancy allows in Izquierda Unida.

The next week The Red Week will be prepared by Fight. How is life very far of Chamberí, it is possible that it does not go out for him badly. Let's trust in it.

Watch The Simpsons S21E14 Postcards from the Wedge free

IN DEFENSE OF THE PENSIONS. OPPOSITE TO THE DESPAIR, THERE IS ALTERNATIVE

With the reform the Government wants:
 To put the hand in the pockets of the pensioners to the value of 80.000 million euros (4 points of the GDP in 2030).
 To favor plans deprived of pensions that they benefit to the Banks.
In Izquierda Unida we are going to fight so that:
 The retirement age does not increase over 65 years.
 The calculation period does not increase to calculate the pension beyond 15 years.
 The pensions revalue at least the same that the prices (IPC) increase and even more for the lowest pensions. We are going to do it mobilizing us in the street to show to the Government the rejection to these measurements and proposing in the Parliament a Law to guarantee the rights of all the pensioners and to stop the "pensionazo".
THE REFORM OF THE GOVERNMENT IS AN INJUSTICE AND, ALSO, UNNECESSARY.
IT IS AN INJUSTICE BECAUSE...
It cuts away the pensions to the value of 80.000 millions as the information of the Government gathered in the Plan of Austerity that has sent Brussels.
When it is applied completely, there will be 12 million pensioners (3,5 millions more that now) and 80.000 million euros less for pensions, that is to say 6.600 euros per year less for pensioner.
The Government does not tell the truth when he affirms that his target is that “the good present situation continues in the future”.
Neither it is truthful on the affected ones by his reform. It harms ALL and ALL, from whom they have today 61 years up to the youth that begins to work.
He affirms that he looks for a major mail between quotations and pension but the reality is that “with the same quotation you will have less pension”. According to the information of this Plan, for every year that increases the calculation for the calculation of the pension, the expense reduces 0,2 % of the GDP. If the calculation period was happening from 15 to 25 years, the perceived would stand out for pensions in approximately 40.000 million euros. All the more years are used for the calculation, lower is the pension because the wages and the most ancient quotations are also lower.
AND, IN ADDITION TO BEING AN INJUSTICE, IT IS NOT NECESSARY, BECAUSE...
The Public System of Pensions is strong and it is consolidated. The year 2009, in full crisis, has had a surplus for 8.500 million euros. The Fund of Guarantee will increase up to 62.000 million euros.
The alarmist arguments of the Government are deceitful and they lack rigor:
 The principal one is the increase of the life expectancy. It is incorrect. The increase of the life expectancy is due to the fact that it has lowered the infant mortality and has improved the health of the population (in any case, this only would mean that there is more contributing). That has increased the life expectancy 4 years does not mean that all the persons live 4 more years.
 He says that the increase of the expense in pensions will be excessive in the future. Neither it is true.
It can turn that in 2030 the number available for factors that are not pensions will be almost 750.000 million euros more than in 2010, and in 2.060 more of the double
 The Government does demographic forecasts without rigor: there cannot be done serious calculations that go beyond 10 years. Also, the decisive thing in a system of pensions of share-out, since it is the Spanish case, there is not the number of young people and adults who exist for every pensioner, but the number of contributing and the amount of the quotation for each of them. Well, the number of contributing and the quoted quantities have increased and they will keep on doing it in the future. According to official information, from 2010 to 2030 there will be an increase of 2,5 millions of contributing and the quotations will increase for the increase of the real wages.
 In Spain, for example, an executive of Bank lives of average 10 years more than the person that it cleans in his Bank. With the proposed reform, this one would have to work two more years so that the executive receives ten years his pension. This is opposite to the social justice and to the common sense.
AND ALL THIS: WHY?
For two principal reasons:
 The Government has decided to favor the Banks facilitating the private pensions. The real beneficiaries of it are the Banks and the agents. Our savings bring enormous benefits. We work for them.
That's why reports publish the banks and the boxes periodically announcing the collapse of the pensions within a period of ten years. The Caixa (in 1998), the BBVA (in 2005 and in 2007), the Bank Santander (in 1992 and in 1999), the Spanish Bank (in 1995, in 1999, in 2002 and in 2009). The target: to create alarm on the future of the public pensions.
 It orders a sign to the big capital investors at the cost of our pensions. “Do not worry, we are ready to do what it is necessary to have, although it goes against many of our voters, to assure high benefits to you. Keep on investing in Spain”.
THEN: IS NOT IT NECESSARY TO CHANGE ANYTHING?
Certainly, it is necessary neither to cut away the pensions (in Italy they represent 14 % of the GDP), to raise the retirement age (France has it at the age of 60), to extend the number of years to calculate the pension.
Izquierda Unida is partial of reinforcing and of consolidating the Public System of Pensions.
WE PROPOSE:
To eliminate the maximum quotation ceilings and to bring the quotation over to the real wages. Do you know that the high wages do not quote for all his compensation? The maximum quotation is fixed for a salary for 3.198 euros for 12 months. Those who gain more, that is to say, more than 38.376 Euros brutto per year, already do not quote any more.
To fight the submerged economy. There can be estimated at least in 800.000 the number of workpeople who are not discharged in the Social security.
To facilitate the incorporation of the woman to the work.
To transform all the scholarships, included those of the Administration, into contracts of employment with high in the Social security.
To fight the fraud of law of some companies that they dismiss at the age of 11 months, or in weekend or work with false autonomous.
To limit the reductions in quotations for programs of creation of employment, when they have demonstrated his ineffectiveness.
Flexibilizar the retirement age of voluntary form in certain professional activities, encouraging in this case the pension.
To impel politics of stimulus of the employment, especially of the youth employment. The reform of the Government tries to make to work to the biggest, while the young people resigns himself to being fallen down in the triplet.
Ultimately, the Public System of Pensions can be partially financed by the taxes. From our point of view, with more justification to pay the expenses of the Royal house.

Warming engines, against the Shoemaker's pensionazo

This evening at 7:30 from the Square of Dr. Zubía, declaration against the pensionazo.

Hitler and the Village of huts

Juan Pablo II inherited an apartment in Madrid and one sold it to a homosexual couple

I dress in 20minutos.es
So believing age Alberto's neighbor that, to his death, left in heredity his apartment of the street of Madrid The Pigeon to the very same Pope Juan Pablo II. It was the year 93 and in Spain not even the laws of couples de facto still existed.
Five years later Alberto, who was living along with his fiancé under the apartment of deceased and catholic missis Patrocinio, noticed that it had moisture in the roof. On having tried to contact with the proprietor of the building, the representative happened of bruces with the apostolic forerunner of the Holy See in Spain, that is to say, at that time of his holiness in our country.: “You it would it like staying?”. The sale offer on the part of Monsignor Lajos Kada was immediate.
Whenever we were teaching him the writing of the apartment with the name of the Pope the poor person was blessing Saying and fact. Little seemed to be important for him then to the Vatican that the house bequeathed to the Pope by a pious Christian was going to turn into the hearth of a couple whose nature was committing an outrage against the human creation, as years later the Woytila successor referred to the homosexual unions, Benedicto XVI. “The Church does not love us, but to carry on business, yes”, affirms Alberto.
In the course of time, like many other couples, Alberto separated and met Miguel Ángel, his current husband and by chance (or not) president of the Group of Lesbians, Gays, Transsexual and Bisexual of Madrid (COGAM).
They began to live together and initiated several reforms. The manager of carrying out them was a born very catholic boy in Poland, homeland of Juan Pablo II. “Whenever we were teaching him the writing of the apartment with the name of the Pope the poor person was crossing itself”, remembers entertaining Alberto.
Both married on July 11, 2008, three years after the coming into effect of the law that was allowing the weddings between persons of the same sex.
"A problem of homophobia"
“The law means rights equality for all the citizens”, tells Miguel Ángel. “The things have changed for good. 10 divided certain years ago were saying that we were dogs and cats, and now there is major acceptance, more visibility, and we can marry... Nevertheless, especially out of the big cities, we keep on having a problem of homophobia in this country, especially if we have an ecclesiastic hierarchy that is the whole day erre that erre”, he adds.
In his speech of end of year the Pope compared the homosexuality with the threat of the climate change When the law of the marriages gays was still in parliamentary step the People's Party and the Spanish Church they put the scream in the sky. “It is like adding pears and apples”, said Ann Botella of that time, wife of the ex-prime minister José Maria Aznar. Soon the PP appealed the norm before the Constitutional Court, alleging that was denaturing “the basic institution of the marriage”. To today the law still waits for judgment.
While, in the Vatican, the Pope made use of his speech of end of year in 2008 to compare the homosexuality with the threat that the climate change supposes for the planet. And it, at the time that it was pushing back to approve the proposed universal decriminalization of the homosexuality that 66 countries presented in the UNO days earlier.
Seen the seen, and of having known it, it is possible that Mrs Patrocinio had thought it two times before bequeathing his house to the holiest father. Amen.